
Paul feels really calm today, which is admirable considering that he is going for a job interview for no less than his dream job, the one he has been preparing for his whole career. Paul knows the job inside out already. He is also pretty familiar with the organisation, having visited its premises on many an occasion and spoken to staff (both current and former). He knows this is the real deal and he is thoroughly prepared.
what would it be like going to a job interview feeling like Paul? It is within your reach too. Not difficult at all although it will require a bit more work than the job hunting technique (or lack thereof) used by the vast majority of candidates I come across. Herein lies your competitive advantage: the majority of candidates who apply for a job, will not have given careful thought to what they really want (you can read more about this
here) nor have they researched the organisation they plan to work for in any detail (more on this
here. When you do, you will be ahead of the competition and increase your chances of getting the job.
I have been recruiting for various organisations over the last seven years. As Human Resources Manager, it is my job to find the best available candidate for each position. One of the challenges I face (even more so in a recession) is that for each job I advertise, I am likely to get in excess of 100 candidates. This makes the shortlisting of candidates a somehow lengthy and sometimes painful process.
Candidates don't seem to consider that their CV is not the only one I receive: it usually comes in a bunch of one hundred (and this is just for one job). On average, I advertise five roles at any given time. You do the sums!

Now, let’s assume that you are me (the recruiter). You arrive to work to be welcome by a pile of 500 CVs. You know that you have to go through them, you know that you are going to open them all and decide which ones to shortlist. And you know that while this is happening, another pile of 200 is building up. As you venture into your first candidate’s CV, it downs on you (like a bucket of cold water) that candidates are not going to make the process any easier for you or for themselves:
- CV “packs” that include a five-page-cv and cover letter, 3 certificates, 4 letters of recommendation and a set of pictures including the candidate’s baby shower, graduation and a set of pictures from their first placement… OH NO!
- The above again, but not in paper copy but on an email containing 18 attachments likely to freeze your average computer
- Green paper, red paper, pink paper, a little verse as an opening statement, a picture of the candidate in A4 format, the CV written in a cut out of a butterfly. You name it: I am sure it is in there!
So, you know that this is going to be a tall order you roll up your sleeves, put all your calls on hold and prepare your shortlisting strategy. At the end of the day, just because candidates do not have an strategy, does not mean that you should do the same and let’s face it, you say to yourself, if candidates cannot make an effort they are likely to loose against those who have and whose CVs are also in that pile sitting on your desk.
Your strategy, as a recruiter, probably includes dismissing CVs that:
- Cover letter opens with: “Dear Mr Ruiz, I have always wanted to work for Marriott”, when your organisation is clearly not Marriott. Perfect example of mass CV-ing.
- The CV or application looks like it has been run over by a truck and/or has gone on a round the world tour (walking). In this case, it possibly will include the following too: coffee stains, a bit of dodgy hair, smudges of marker pen, tipex, something that looks suspiciously like blood.
- Include anything other that a CV and a one page (A4) cover letter. (Yes, I have received cover letters in A5, A3 and almost every other size).
- Comes on an email with unsolicited or useless (at this point) information attached.
- The cover letter or email or (if an ad via caterer) screening questions contain spelling or grammar that would give your average English teacher a heart attack (what does this say about candidate’s attention to detail)
This strategy will help you screen over 80% of your candidates in a relatively short time.
OK, that’s it. You are not the recruiter anymore. You are you, probably a candidate searching for a job. You are now armed with the knowledge of where your CV is going to end up if it does not meet certain standards: the "we will keep your CV on file..." drawer.
The above does not even cover the topic on how your CV should look like, it merely discusses what it should NOT look like for it to remain within that elusive 20%. AMAZING! I told you it would not be that difficult. All it takes is a bit of planning, common sense and strategy.
REMEMBER THAT AS A RECRUITER:

- I am not interested (at this point) in every qualification or reference you ever received. It is unlikely to impress me and I can always ask (if interested) later on in the recruitment process. Keep it short, clean and to the point.
- I want to feel that candidates know about my organisation, they have done enough research to drop a couple of ACCURATE sentences on their cover letter.
- I want to see the candidate’s attention to detail in their CV and cover letter: no spelling / grammatical mistakes, CV looks clean, neat and new (no photocopies please)
- If CV is sent by email, do not use “Dear Sir/Madam”. Instead find out who is likely to read your CV and address it to that person. (Attention to detail and proof of research in action).
- Again, if by email, it is fine to write the cover letter as the main body of the mail. Then you only need to attach one document (CV) instead of two, or twenty (as is often the case)
Would you agree that your chances are increased by following some of the above advice?
Do you think that, as a recruiter, I am being unreasonable?
Have you got any experience, as a recruiter or candidate, that relates to any of the above?
Do you have any other tips for candidates?
TO BE CONTINUED…